Discussion about this post

User's avatar
William Green's avatar

Thanks for this—unflinching and capacious. You neither rush to condemn nor retreat into abstraction. What you call a paradox—keeping the arsenal without using it—might simply be the moral cost of not being naïve. Your reading of Feynman honors that same tension. He refuses the posture of sage, yet can’t shrug off consequence. The dramatic monologue works—because you let the poetry emerge from his cadence without forcing insight where he offers none. Bob Wilson, by contrast, keeps the conscience alive. His quiet protest doesn’t demand agreement, only attention. It's good to mark this day by listening to those who couldn’t forget.

Expand full comment
Scott H.'s avatar

"Don’t look at me,” I said. “You started it!”

But that was it, you see. ‘Cuz once you start

To do an awful thing for all the best

Of reasons, you stop thinking. You just stop.

Except for Bob. I guess he never stopped."

Lots of truth here.

In a way, nuclear weapons are a microcosmic example of how Original Sin matters and taints everything else. In this case, the original sin with nuclear weapons is developing working ones in the first place. You open Pandoras box or dig too greedily and awaken a Balrog.

That nuclear weapons got used is almost an afterthought in comparison to the problem of initial creation. Creating a situation where evil tools end up getting deployed in a defensive/stable arrangement highlights the fallenness of this world.

In the microbiological sphere, engineering pathogens (a la Demon in the Freezer) are doing similar things, as are to an even greater degree some of the engineering of embryos with more than two parents to name just two examples.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts